Microsoft’s search engine is still dominating the search results in many US cities.
Google’s search engines are still dominant in some other countries, too.
The fact that Google dominates searches in all these countries doesn’t mean that it should be treated as a monopolist.
That’s a different story.
But Google does play a major role in determining which of the billions of webpages people see.
And when Google does that, it should have to follow the same rules as Microsoft and other tech giants.
This is one of those cases where Google has the edge.
The story that Google and other companies are selling is that they are a neutral arbiter of the web’s fundamental nature.
It’s a story that works for Google.
The problem is that it doesn’t work for the people who are actually using the web.
That is why antitrust laws are so important.
If companies like Google and Facebook can’t even get the same level of antitrust protection as the government, what hope do you have for the future of the internet?
That’s why it’s so important for consumers to be involved in the decision-making process.
If you want to buy a product or service on the internet, you have to do it through the companies that sell it to you.
That means you have the same rights to complain about it as the people that buy the product or the service.
And if you want your privacy to be protected, you should be able to do so too.
The next time you see an ad on the web, ask yourself what kind of information does the company know about you?
If you’re an online consumer, ask yourselves whether you want the information shared with companies like Microsoft or Google, who are in control of your data.
And you should ask yourself whether that data is useful to you or not.
In short, it’s not enough to say that Google is “neutral” in search.
It has to be “neutral in the way that it uses information to help us make informed decisions about what we see on the Internet.”
That means that the companies must also follow a set of rules that are both clear and transparent.
They should disclose the information that Google uses and their agreements with the companies they use it with.
They must also disclose their data practices and what happens when those practices violate the rules.
But don’t expect any of these rules to protect you from companies that can’t be trusted.
As Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella wrote in a recent blog post, “When you buy something on the online shopping portal Amazon, for example, you know that your information is being collected by Amazon and used for Amazon’s own ends, whether you like it or not.”
If you buy a new pair of shoes from Amazon, Amazon will probably use your information to track you down.
If the company is using your information for other purposes, it might be violating antitrust laws.
If Amazon wants to make your shopping experience better, it could use the information to tell you how to find and buy items.
If it wants to sell more of your products, it can track your purchases and sell more.
And so on.
But if your shopping is not directly tied to a product, then it’s likely to be used by Amazon.
In fact, Amazon’s new business model, called Prime Now, is basically a web-based store that sells the same products as the grocery store and the coffee shop.
And even though Amazon says it won’t share your information with third parties, it does share with you a lot of information about what you buy, where you buy it, how much you pay for it, and how long it takes to receive your products.
And this information is used to target ads to you based on your preferences.
The only problem with this system is that Amazon and its partners don’t have to disclose this information.
Amazon doesn’t even have to tell its partners what you want it to do.
If they don’t want to share your personal information, they don